ZK runs even 10 times faster than ICEfaces in the test case

asked 2009-06-29 20:16:36 +0800

sousa1981
573 ● 4

I found very interest comparison at http://www.richability.com/files/59c9f28f3b317a8687a9564db8f052d8-24.html

Summary
In all of above tests, ZK outscores ICEfaces regarding server response time, and memory
consumption. ZK runs even 10 times faster than ICEfaces in the test case, Grid with 150
records. And its memory consumption is less than ICEface’s, from one half to one fourth.
Overall, ZK performs better performance, and scalability than ICEfaces.
 Simple form:
 The response time of ZK is as good as its static page, and its response is six times
faster than ICEfaces when 900 concurrent users.
 Averagely, ICEfaces consumes 2 times of memory than ZK.
 Grid with 15 records
 Less than 3 seconds response time of ZK when 100 concurrent threads.
 The response time of ZK is 3 times faster than ICEfaces when 900 threads.
 Averagely, ICEfaces consumes 2 times of memory than ZK.
 Grid with 150 records
 The response time of ZK is less than 5 seconds when 600 concurrent threads.
 ZK is 10 times faster than ICEfaces when 300 concurrent threads.
 Averagely, ICEfaces consumes 2.5 times of memory than ZK.